4 ms·
How idealistic of you to assume people will even be able to agree on what's a sensical and nonsensical suggestion. OP indeed has mutually exclusive phrases. If
by pdimitar 2y ago
How idealistic of you to assume people will even be able to agree on what's a sensical and nonsensical suggestion.
OP indeed has mutually exclusive phrases. If we ever get to the "extremely directs facts/proofs" then things get super easy, of course.
99% of the problem when working with people is to even arrive at that stage.
I predict a "well, work somewhere else then" response which I'll just roll my eyes at. You should know that this comes at a big cost for many. And even more cannot afford it. Literally.
- austin-cheney 2y agoIt’s a personal decision assessment method. Other people are irrelevant. I really believe you did not understand the article or my comment.
- pdimitar 2y agoTo take a face value such a blatant generalization like "I really believe you did not understand the article or my comment" you might want to give an example? I did not find the article illuminating one bit. I agree with some of the criticisms wholeheartedly, mind you, but the article is just a rant.
- austin-cheney 2y agoIt’s a well founded rant because most people employed to write software cannot program, communicate at an adult level, or follow simple instructions. The comments here unintentionally qualify this assessment.
- Dansvidania 2y agowhich of the three pillars you list above does this statement fall under?
- austin-cheney 2y agoEvidence. Its demonstrable, provable, and quantifiable. It's also why interviewing is so bad.
- pdimitar 2y ago> The comments here unintentionally qualify this assessment. Which comments might those be? Be concrete. You also didn't give any example as I asked, you are happy just generalizing so it's not really interesting to engage with you, is what I am finding.