2 ms·
I completely agree. They even have a picture of the light source used to do the scans as if that's more important than the people who did the actual work. I c
by timewizard 2y ago
I completely agree. They even have a picture of the light source used to do the scans as if that's more important than the people who did the actual work.
I can't understand the editorial bent in this article. I think editors believe scientists to be vaunted and inaccessible creatures that live in the rarefied climbs of "science mountain." Meanwhile it's just some kid down the block who would love to be interviewed by the BBC.
- adastra22 2y agoI'm pretty sure Luke has a lot more things to worry about right now than being interviewed by the BBC, lol.
- timewizard 2y agoThat's nice of you to decide that for him and for all the people who read that publication.
- adastra22 2y agoThe context missing here is that Luke is one of the principal analysts at DOGE, and the target of A LOT of mainstream media hit pieces over the last week.