4 ms·
It's a hangover from the ill-fated Clinton programming language, where you repeat an operator (such as "is") to ensure there is no ambiguity about what your int
by PaulDavisThe1st 2y ago
It's a hangover from the ill-fated Clinton programming language, where you repeat an operator (such as "is") to ensure there is no ambiguity about what your intention is.
- zelphirkalt 2y agoDid you mean to write "there is is no ambiguity ..."?
- mattigames 2y agoToo early for that pun, it works better at the end as a punchline of sorts, "ensure there is not ambiguity about what your intention is is."