4 ms·
>it thought it was meant to be there, that it was a technical term or a codename for something That's such a classical human behaviour in technical discussions
by sigmoid10 2y ago
>it thought it was meant to be there, that it was a technical term or a codename for something
That's such a classical human behaviour in technical discussions, I wouldn't even be mad. I'm more surprised that picked up on that behaviour from human generated datasets. But I suppose that's what you get from scraping places like Stackoverflow and HN.
- ben_w 2y agoI'm reminded of one of the earlier anecdotes from OpenAI about fine-tuning — to paraphrase: > This writer fine tuned on all their slack messages, then asked it to write a blog post. It replied "Sure, I'll do it tomorrow" > Then he said "No, do it now", and it replied "OK, sure thing" and did nothing else.
- codr7 2y agoThat would be a mistake, probably. But if it keeps randomly happening too often, I'm sure pretty soon someone would get mad, because they're not even trying.