3 ms·
> if Trump hadn't amplified allegations of this community as illegal immigrants eating dogs and cats, would they have been harassed and threatened? Agree you'
by rdtsc 2y ago
> if Trump hadn't amplified allegations of this community as illegal immigrants eating dogs and cats, would they have been harassed and threatened?
Agree you're probably right. I never watched that debate, thanks for the clip. I won't watch it further I didn't like either one of them too much.
I did like the remix though, I am sure there are plenty of more of those.
But it seems that group is being sued and that's hopefully they lose and that'll be the best outcome here.
- ctrlp 2y agoDon't bother joking with serial abusers of good faith on HN. They don't have a sense of irony. It's likely congenital.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- tomrod 2y agoAlways helpful to review the guidelines. Thanks for the opportunity to do so [0] > In Comments > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes > Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." > Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community. > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. This isn't comprehensive, but it is enough to identify what you and I may take for granted from others in the community. If you feel I have abused good faith in my comments, I request you delineate what, exactly, you feel is not in good faith. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- ctrlp 2y agotomrod, you're a serial abuser of the guidelines. You should take some time to think about what you say and do on HN and whether you are adding to the discourse are detracting from it. I think you could adjust your tone on almost all your political comments to be more thoughtful and less combative. It would be less work to point out cases where you observe the spirit of these guidelines than where you violate them. I'm sure you wouldn't wish to be so prejudiced, but you come across as an ideologue. Is that really who you want to be?
- tomrod 2y agoAgree to disagree on your general take. Best to you.