3 ms·
> I looked at that table and immediately thought, "Those are pretty solid correlation values", so I was confused by the point you were making. They said "highe
by Jensson 2y ago
> I looked at that table and immediately thought, "Those are pretty solid correlation values", so I was confused by the point you were making.
They said "highest", not "solid". Family income isn't the highest factor there.
- notTooFarGone 2y agoOf course if having a brain would be on the table there would be no contest. Being the highest correlation in a rather arbitrary list is not a valid qualifier for being a good correlation.
- thaumasiotes 2y ago> Of course if having a brain would be on the table there would be no contest. Is that really what you think? In reality, the possession of a brain can't have any correlation with SAT scores at all, because there is zero variance in the trait.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]