4 ms·

SSRIs are by no means safe or well-tolerated. They have all sorts of severe, life-altering, mostly permanent side effects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selecti

SSRIs are by no means safe or well-tolerated. They have all sorts of severe, life-altering, mostly permanent side effects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_serotonin_reuptake_inhibitor#Side_effects https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_serotonin_reuptake_i... There are countless heartbreaking stories of people who were prescribed these drugs not knowing what they were subscribing to. In many cases, the effects of those drugs are worse than the symptoms they are supposed to alleviate. With "I Don't Wanna Be Me" there's even a song by Type O Negative (from Peter Steele's own experience with Prozac) about the devastating effects SSRIs can have on a person's life. These drugs are handed out like candy while the physicians prescribing them often point-blank deny any side effects or even attribute those to the illness they are meant to treat. Psychedelics, on the other hand, have actually been proven to be effective for many syndromes SSRIs are commonly used for and by comparison are very safe when used with proper preparation, medical surveillance, and in the right setting. The only reason psychedelics are still widely shunned is a Puritan attitude to human well-being: You're not supposed to feel better than the common neutral base level. Any drugs achieving that (alongside with other, more specific and intended medical effects) are maligned and ostracized.

mandarax8 2y ago
You're saying this as if psychedelics cannot 'have all sorts of severe, life-altering, mostly permanent side effects'.
- BjoernKW 2y ago
  Yes, they certainly can. However, the prevalence of side effects with psychedelics is in the single-digit range, whereas with SSRIs you're almost certain to be experiencing some sort of - often severe - side effects for the rest of your life.
throw18376 2y ago
this is more or less exactly what i was trying to say. for most people SSRIs are safe, they experience manageable side effects and little health risk. psychedelics and dissociatives seem like they must be really drastic and risky. but actually SSRIs are pretty risky too, there are all these terrible low-probability outcomes. so it's good we have all options, but ideally we'd have a better way of judging who is safest with which treatment.
- BjoernKW 2y ago
  With SSRIs you have a one in three chance for any number of the following side effects; many of them permanent, even after discontinuing medication (if you actually manage to do so, since SSRI come with severe withdrawal symptoms): - sexual dysfunction - loss of emotion and creativity - drowsiness - insomnia (including real fun stuff like night terrors) - fatigue - nausea - tremors I'd hardly call that safe or manageable. With even the most potent psychedelics such as LSD, on the other hand, there's merely a one in thousand chance for severe side effects. I'd go as far as prohibiting the prescription of SSRIs for all but the most severe cases (such as a severe depression where the patient is actually suicidal). For everything else these drugs are commonly used for, e.g., mild depression, OCD, or IBS, there are other - in many cases better - options with far less devastating (if any) adverse effects.
  - Capricorn2481 2y ago
    > many of them permanent Almost none of these would be permanent, and you certainly don't have a 1 in 3 chance of them being permanent. Where did you get that number? > With even the most potent psychedelics such as LSD, on the other hand, there's merely a one in thousand chance for severe side effects. This is fucking nuts. We're in a thread about how taking too much can clearly cause weeks of psychosis, and how easy it is to do that. There's nothing wrong with warning about the risks of SSRIs, but to claim you have a 1 in 3 chance of having permanent nausea while, in the same breath, claiming psychedelics are 100x safer, is beyond irresponsible.
    - BjoernKW 2y ago
      > Almost none of these would be permanent Sexual dysfunction caused by SSRIs in many cases persists for the rest of the patient's life. > and you certainly don't have a 1 in 3 chance of them being permanent. Where did you get that number? Those are actual numbers from scientific studies: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719451/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719451/ > in the same breath, claiming psychedelics are 100x safer, is beyond irresponsible. Stating mere facts isn't irresponsible and those are the facts: When taking SSRIs you have a one in three chance to permanently and severely change your life for the worse. When taking LSD you have a 1 in 1,000 chance of suffering a psychotic break. What's irresponsible - and unethical - is twisting and misrepresenting these facts - to the extent of outright lying about the purported innocuousness of SSRI, as is wont in the psychiatric community.
mistrial9 2y ago
> The only reason psychedelics are still widely shunned is .. no, more complicated than that..

mandarax8 2y ago

You're saying this as if psychedelics cannot 'have all sorts of severe, life-altering, mostly permanent side effects'.

BjoernKW 2y ago
Yes, they certainly can. However, the prevalence of side effects with psychedelics is in the single-digit range, whereas with SSRIs you're almost certain to be experiencing some sort of - often severe - side effects for the rest of your life.

throw18376 2y ago

this is more or less exactly what i was trying to say. for most people SSRIs are safe, they experience manageable side effects and little health risk. psychedelics and dissociatives seem like they must be really drastic and risky. but actually SSRIs are pretty risky too, there are all these terrible low-probability outcomes. so it's good we have all options, but ideally we'd have a better way of judging who is safest with which treatment.

BjoernKW 2y ago
With SSRIs you have a one in three chance for any number of the following side effects; many of them permanent, even after discontinuing medication (if you actually manage to do so, since SSRI come with severe withdrawal symptoms): - sexual dysfunction - loss of emotion and creativity - drowsiness - insomnia (including real fun stuff like night terrors) - fatigue - nausea - tremors I'd hardly call that safe or manageable. With even the most potent psychedelics such as LSD, on the other hand, there's merely a one in thousand chance for severe side effects. I'd go as far as prohibiting the prescription of SSRIs for all but the most severe cases (such as a severe depression where the patient is actually suicidal). For everything else these drugs are commonly used for, e.g., mild depression, OCD, or IBS, there are other - in many cases better - options with far less devastating (if any) adverse effects.
- Capricorn2481 2y ago
  > many of them permanent Almost none of these would be permanent, and you certainly don't have a 1 in 3 chance of them being permanent. Where did you get that number? > With even the most potent psychedelics such as LSD, on the other hand, there's merely a one in thousand chance for severe side effects. This is fucking nuts. We're in a thread about how taking too much can clearly cause weeks of psychosis, and how easy it is to do that. There's nothing wrong with warning about the risks of SSRIs, but to claim you have a 1 in 3 chance of having permanent nausea while, in the same breath, claiming psychedelics are 100x safer, is beyond irresponsible.
  - BjoernKW 2y ago
    > Almost none of these would be permanent Sexual dysfunction caused by SSRIs in many cases persists for the rest of the patient's life. > and you certainly don't have a 1 in 3 chance of them being permanent. Where did you get that number? Those are actual numbers from scientific studies: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719451/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719451/ > in the same breath, claiming psychedelics are 100x safer, is beyond irresponsible. Stating mere facts isn't irresponsible and those are the facts: When taking SSRIs you have a one in three chance to permanently and severely change your life for the worse. When taking LSD you have a 1 in 1,000 chance of suffering a psychotic break. What's irresponsible - and unethical - is twisting and misrepresenting these facts - to the extent of outright lying about the purported innocuousness of SSRI, as is wont in the psychiatric community.

mistrial9 2y ago

> The only reason psychedelics are still widely shunned is .. no, more complicated than that..