3 ms·
> a ton of people to be unable to continue living in those areas That sounds like more of a solution than a problem: those places are going to burn, so it's be
by marssaxman 2y ago
> a ton of people to be unable to continue living in those areas
That sounds like more of a solution than a problem: those places are going to burn, so it's better that people stop living there.
- UncleEntity 2y agoIronically, if they just let them naturally burn in the first place there wouldn't be even a fraction of damage caused by these modern wildfires.
- Qwertious 2y agoIIRC it's a funding problem - controlled burns require a ton of manpower to control, and the longer since the last burn, the harder it is to control.