> Had it been released in 2011, it would be a viable twitter alternative. It was a viable twitter alternative when it was released. One of the reasons they clo

> Had it been released in 2011, it would be a viable twitter alternative. It was a viable twitter alternative when it was released. One of the reasons they closed shop (acquired) was that they couldn't compete with Twitter. How would they do better in 2011 when Twitter was so entrenched in internet culture?