2 ms·

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towers_in_the_park#Criticism_and_current_state https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towers_in_the_park#Criticism_a... who said they were

• MichaelZuo 2y ago
  Are you confused about what a question is and what a claim is? The question is about whether you believe they are fake or not. I don’t have any claims in either direction. e.g. “Didn’t pan out that well” according to what authoratative sources? You can’t get around it via linking a wikipedia article with opinions expressed by other random people, without any more authority or credibility than many HN users. Edit: And if there is no source with such, then it needs to be proven via logical arguments, observational evidence, etc.
  • WrongAssumption 2y ago
    He literally gave an explanation, which if you wanted more details about you could have enquired for him to expand. Instead you brought up the non-sequitur of fake pictures, and didn't engage him in the discussion. Just demanded sources while providing none yourself.
    • MichaelZuo 2y ago
      Why is your opinion about what another HN user wrote even meaningful? Anything that user writes in the future will automatically supersede it. And your opinion about the interpretation of someone else’s comment can never outweigh anyone else’s opinion on the same… so it seems empty of any substance.