4 ms·
In its Dr Doolittle implications the article is comforting to read but not convincing as a scientific discovery; this "law" seems to be of the same class as thi
by mellosouls 2y ago
In its Dr Doolittle implications the article is comforting to read but not convincing as a scientific discovery; this "law" seems to be of the same class as things like the Pareto (80/20) principle and possibly more abstract and nebulous than attributable to some shared intellectual co-living space with our fellow animals.