4 ms·
I think both arguments have credibility. The R4L says they will make sure the Rust code is fixed when the C code is, and that's admirable, but the concern it m
by ChocolateGod 2y ago
I think both arguments have credibility.
The R4L says they will make sure the Rust code is fixed when the C code is, and that's admirable, but the concern it means a developer now has to wait for that, holding up their work for release/submission. The bus factor is now on the R4L team.
Meanwhile, everyone involved in development for Linux already knows C.
- steveklabnik 2y ago> the concern it means a developer now has to wait for that, holding up their work for release/submission. They do not have to wait.
- ChocolateGod 2y agoThat's apparently still unclear according to the LKML.