4 ms·
Really, a question, on experiences. They got performance gains. But would GO be as useful for the quick ad-hoc programming that python seems to be great at?
by FrustratedMonky 2y ago
Really, a question, on experiences.
They got performance gains.
But would GO be as useful for the quick ad-hoc programming that python seems to be great at?
or, Could GO also be a replacement for quick ad-hoc programs.
Since ad-hoc always grows into something un-supportable. If GO is option, then maybe start with it first?