3 ms·
By controlling camera access Meta gets more control over the peripheral ecosystem. And they don't competition with their AI assistant. But camera access is so
by cma 2y ago
By controlling camera access Meta gets more control over the peripheral ecosystem. And they don't competition with their AI assistant. But camera access is so fundamental to true transforming AR, really reskinning and modifying the world, that it is kind of inevitable and they have made noises about opening it.
And they began allowing USB cameras within the last year: not a viable sooution for consumer applications, only a tiny fraction of your market will have one plugged in, but at least for now enables research and location based experiences, where the on location event provides the setup.
They do already allow depth sensor access which is a form of camera.
A more open system allowing trusted access at the system level and empowering the user would allow innovation for providers of thinflgs like you to prefiltering layers to the camera data to blur out text on documents etc. so you could have tiers of trusted apps with different levels of access. And really empowering the user would let you put Meta's own apps behind this layer.
- wkat4242 2y agoMeta will probably follow suit once apps come out that show the benefits of this access on Android XR. Their opening of their ecosystem is also a pretty recent move and I think it might happen anyway in that light. In any case it's not really something I'd write meta off for.
- cma 2y agoI'm not ruling it out, that's what I meant with they have made noises about opening it and the other stuff about how it is almost inevitable for real transformative AR. I pretty much do rule out the stuff that would let you control it with custom coded filters filtering even what meta apps can see though