4 ms·
But the discrimination angle is interesting. What if a law required everyone to be "transparent" and respond truthfully to "are you [some race]"?
by pishpash 2y ago
But the discrimination angle is interesting. What if a law required everyone to be "transparent" and respond truthfully to "are you [some race]"?
- thfuran 2y agoI don't really see the analogy, unless you're arguing that chatgpt deserves human rights.
- yellowapple 2y agoAt some point AIs will be smart enough that they might very well deserve human rights. That point's probably sooner than any of us expect.
- johnnyanmac 2y agoBut a bot isn't a human. It doesn't have any rights nor even indirect rights like animals do. It's a tool and I don't see anything wrong with tools being clear about what they are. And I especially do not like beokg tricked by a non-human pretending to be human.
- scarab92 2y agoDiscriminate just means differentiate. The parent comment isn't talking about race, they are talking about discriminating between human and human tool (bot).