I understand being against this law on practicality / constitutionality grounds. It seems to me that the "converse" law would be more useful and legally appropr

I understand being against this law on practicality / constitutionality grounds. It seems to me that the "converse" law would be more useful and legally appropriate: forbid people from making intentionally deceptive bots that claim to be human or have human-like emotional/social capabilities.