3 ms·
Mercurial has both "real" branches (history is kept so you can always tell what revisions were in what branch) as well as git "branch is just a pointer tag" So
by capitainenemo 2y ago
Mercurial has both "real" branches (history is kept so you can always tell what revisions were in what branch) as well as git "branch is just a pointer tag"
So really you can choose whatever suits your needs.
Personally the things I love about mercurial are:
more consistent commandline (that's the simple part others bring up)
revsets (awesome query language for revisions, there's also filesets, but I don't use that as much)
absorb (I think someone added a git extension that does something similar a few months ago)
fa --deleted
grep --all
phases ♥