3 ms·
I think it's the same sort of idea but at a lower level (as it were). The (very) few times I've tried to explain recursion to non-CS-types have always been met
by rahoulb 14y ago
I think it's the same sort of idea but at a lower level (as it were).
The (very) few times I've tried to explain recursion to non-CS-types have always been met with "I sort of get it" looks (meaning "we'll have forgotten in five minutes").
But there seems to be no pattern to the non-tech people who don't understand tree-views.
The only thing I've noticed is it might be maths-related - as people in the accounts departments invariably get trees straight away.