4 ms·
I think it is fair, because professionals do not use cheap tricks, but at least they are trying to distance themselves when writing a report. I like discussions
by majgr 2y ago
I think it is fair, because professionals do not use cheap tricks, but at least they are trying to distance themselves when writing a report. I like discussions when Sławomir Sierakowski (from Krytyka Polityczna) is present, because he always have some new ideas, new ways to describe reality. Although, I do not follow Krytyka Polityczna.
- mistermann 2y agoWhen someone is hired into a professional job, is there something in the laws of physics that prevent them from doing wrong?
- TeMPOraL 2y agoWhat is the job anyway? Almost all of the publishing is ultimately funded by ads, therefore the primary job of everyone involved is to generate ad impressions. What's being attributed to "professionals" in this thread is actually the opposite of what the job pays for.
- mistermann 2y agoIt is very funny how humans experience reality eh? Like, the literal assignment of a word to something can cause the representation of it in a person's mind (aka the reality) to change. Also weird: it is essentially not possible to talk about the phenomenon in a serious way (participants range of possible actions become highly constrained, and therefore highly predictable). I really wonder if this normative phenomenon will be able to survive in the age of AI.
- majgr 2y ago> When someone is hired into a professional job, is there something in the laws of physics that prevent them from doing wrong? No, but work of journalists is highly visible. Probably, this creates more incentive to write according to rules of the trade. There are examples of journalists who went with ruling regime and got monetary prizes. Some are switching to it now, betting that regime change again and their dedication will bring rewards.
- mistermann 2y ago[dead]