"likely to be access by children", "proportionate systems", "or age estimation", "except where a term of service indicates (in whatever words) that the presence

"likely to be access by children", "proportionate systems", "or age estimation", "except where a term of service indicates (in whatever words) that the presence of that kind of primary priority content that is harmful to children is prohibited on the service", etc. So, no, there is not requirement to implement strong age verification across the board. This is an over-reaction. My interpretation of the guidance is not to be too quick to discard likelihood, not to go over the top. Again, you are not going to get into trouble because you don't ask your gardening forum's members to send you copies of their passports...