3 ms·
Like many comments, I find we can eliminate it without losing anything by using better variable names. seconds++; That gets the idea across very clearly to
by steve_adams_86 2y ago
Like many comments, I find we can eliminate it without losing anything by using better variable names.
seconds++;
That gets the idea across very clearly to me and has the benefit of (likely) making the rest of the code clearer too
- sethammons 2y agoand the variable will invariably store milliseconds because someone didn't read the docs on timelib.Now() or store an int as a counter for makeshift vector clock :p types for the win