3 ms·
Please actually read what I wrote because you say that, but at the same time you've now twice projected assumed positions of mine that only would make sense in
by 0dayz 2y ago
Please actually read what I wrote because you say that, but at the same time you've now twice projected assumed positions of mine that only would make sense in your mind if I was some progressive liberal stereotype.
Because no, I have never said that I would ignore those gullible people.
Ontop of this I fail to see what supposed soul searching we need to do, for example if I believe in free speech and the gullible voter voted for a president because they promised to flattered them while also promising to remove free speech and jail anyone who speak unfavorablely about them.
Or how about a real example, what soul searching did the republicans have to do when the south seceed? Or how about the social democrats, liberals and the few conservatives who were executed by the nazis, they should've have been more antisemitic? While Hitler took control via technicality rules?
- jimkleiber 2y agoWhat I'm saying is that it sounds like you're saying there's nothing people can do, that it's other people's behaviors that need to change, that nothing we can do will change their behaviors regarding this specific instance. Is that what you're saying? That it is the other people's responsibility to fix this, not ours?
- 0dayz 2y agoYou can change their behavior once they realize they have done a mistake, otherwise it's completely impossible. So no that is not what I am saying the problem isn't even changing their behavior as a priority but instead it's the fact they are that gullible.