3 ms·
The problem is both are still sexist; where is the money to pay for training coming from? If it's a government initiative then it's taking from all to only giv
by typewithrhythm 2y ago
The problem is both are still sexist; where is the money to pay for training coming from?
If it's a government initiative then it's taking from all to only give to women.
If it's a publicly owned company, then can you actually make a convincing case that it's a benefit to stockholders?
Only in the case of a private company does this lack ethical issues, but at that point it's just some billionaires whim.
- thot_experiment 2y agoYes we actually want to take from everyone and give to disadvantaged people, we should do this as a society because even crudely implemented it is a good first approximation of capturing externalities shareholder value fails to.
- typewithrhythm 2y agoI'm sorry, but I genuinely don't follow what you mean by this...