4 ms·
It is different though. There are law journal articles debating whether the Impoundment Control Act is constitutional. And that isn’t a new thing, here’s one f
by skissane 2y ago
It is different though.
There are law journal articles debating whether the Impoundment Control Act is constitutional. And that isn’t a new thing, here’s one from 1990: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/umkc58&div=15&id=&page= https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/...
There’s a big difference between a law for which there have been longstanding serious scholarly objections to its constitutionality, and a law whose constitutionality has never been questioned in any serious forum
- llamaimperative 2y agoReally? Because SCOTUS actually ruled the President very well might be immune from any criminal repercussions from mowing down civilians from a helicopter-mounted machine gun. Seems like there’s at least “a debate” to be had.