3 ms·

No one I know who has been migrated to Teams has been happy about that change.

• wkat4242 2y ago
  +1. The only thing better about teams is that it comes 'free' with Microsoft 365. Though you can now take that without it for about 1.50 per month less. But slack costs a lot more. On paper they can do the same but slack is just so much better in terms of UX. Though i do hate that they dropped the IRC bridge. I have been active in slack communities a lot less as a result. I always have my IRC open but not slack.
  • rhubarbtree 2y ago
    For companies using teams rather than slack: why not use excel rather than a CRM? You'll save lots of money. Use Google hangouts instead of Zoom. Free videocalling, why worry about quality? It's not clear to me that you actually save money by using worse technology, if it takes more time to do stuff (after you've restarted teams three times to try to get share screen to work, for example).
    • wkat4242 2y ago
      Yes but that money you waste doesn't come out of the budget of the guy proudly proclaiming to have saved a lot of money :) And it's very hard to quantify. Internalise the profits, externalise the negatives. It's what companies do but also what departments do within companies.