This is the only argument I've seen for why a second look at generative AI for (new) software developers might not be an unmitigated train-wreck… …yet the auth

This is the only argument I've seen for why a second look at generative AI for (new) software developers might not be an unmitigated train-wreck… …yet the author's points are completely invalidated by the lack of any explanation for how they intend to address the myriad of horrifying ethical lapses involved in how these models are developed and deployed—not to mention why most of the key influencers in this "AI" movement are deeply anti-craft and anti-humanist. We in the pro-craft protest movement are happy to engage in good-faith conversations about which types of "AI" technologies might be good at in the future given satisfying resolutions to the host of ethical issues currently involved, but articles like this which seem shockingly unaware of this fierce debate simply come across as uninformed, and uninformative.