4 ms·
I don't think it's "production over consumption". At least I don't like that framing. For me it's about supporting production. The humans that write news articl
by delusional 2y ago
I don't think it's "production over consumption". At least I don't like that framing. For me it's about supporting production. The humans that write news articles every day can't produce that valuable work if they don't get fairly compensated for it. It's not that the AI produces more, it's that the AI destabilizes production. It makes it impossible to produce.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> It's not that the AI produces more We're not debating whether they do. "Humans that write news articles" are producing. That contrasts with "an individual mak[ing] a single copy of a song and giv[ing] it to a friend." We don't put journalists in jail for plagiarism.
- delusional 2y ago> We don't put journalists in jail for plagiarism. I'm guessing you're imagining a scenario here were a journalist has copied an entire article verbatim and republished it in their newspaper. That would actually be both copyright infringement AND plagiarism. Newspapers just rarely enforce that right. These two things aren't on a scale. They are independent infractions.