4 ms·
That would be a result set layer, not a connection pool. Could make sense if you worked with rows, but if you use ORM, why mapping cached row again and again? O
by ivan_gammel 2y ago
That would be a result set layer, not a connection pool. Could make sense if you worked with rows, but if you use ORM, why mapping cached row again and again? ORMs cache hydrated objects, which seems to be more efficient.
- capitainenemo 2y agoYeah, it was more to see if there were any benefits to an ORM that could be used without the, well "ORM" part :)