4 ms·
recent concerns from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/onlyoffice https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/onlyoffice >> Since Qt5 is now already outdated, > Yes,
by dsp_person 2y ago
recent concerns from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/onlyoffice https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/onlyoffice
>> Since Qt5 is now already outdated,
> Yes, every dependency onlyoffice uses is outdated. They even use v8 8.9 that doesn't include any security patches. They also uses outdated CEF binary downloaded from an http url and doesn't check its integrity at all. Even worse, that CEF binary might be closed source as suggested by dbermond in https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/issues/1664 https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/issues/1664
> I would advise anyone who uses onlyoffice to avoid opening any untrusted documents with it. It appears that onlyoffice upstream doesn't care about security at all. See https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/issues/1664 https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/issues/1664 for more details