3 ms·
> This isn't "slapping a new coat of paint for propaganda," but rather exposing the rest of the iceberg that was otherwise concealed. Our Blessed Homeland vs.
by perching_aix 2y ago
> This isn't "slapping a new coat of paint for propaganda," but rather exposing the rest of the iceberg that was otherwise concealed.
Our Blessed Homeland vs. Their Barbarous Wastes
- s3r3nity 2y agoTheir Blessed Homeland vs. Our Barbarous Wastes
- perching_aix 2y ago[flagged]
- Gud 2y agoWhat’s up with the hostility? You doing ok?
- perching_aix 2y agoThanks for asking, I think I do, yes. I'm not sure what you find particularly hostile about it - they edited out what they originally had to say, but even then, I'm not saying anything extraordinary. Telling people they're acting childish and are not bringing anything to the table argumentation wise I think is pretty low on the hostility scale. The irony of being called out as hostile after confronting someone that they're just asserting their opinions is definitely not lost on me. What a thread...
- s3r3nity 2y agoIt’s more of a “yes, and…” comment. Namely, both are relevant, but previously only one side was highlighted.
- perching_aix 2y agoNeither are "relevant" in my opinion, not yours, not theirs. Both are inflammatory, subjective characterizations from different ends of the horseshoe. These are never productive or insightful, and that's why I brought up "Their Blessed Homeland vs. Our Barbarous Wastes".