As a rural person, who had advovated for many enviromental causes,has lived with wolf hybrids as pets, and has a large pack of coyotes living in very close prox

As a rural person, who had advovated for many enviromental causes,has lived with wolf hybrids as pets, and has a large pack of coyotes living in very close proximity, "coyotes" because they are way bigger than the now extinct pure coyote, I shall muse for your entertainment,the human factor is the most difficult, and has been argued every which was for decades, but through shear numbers and persistance, non rural people have got there way, and it(wolves) has been forced rough shod on an already embatled rural population. So the only thing that might help the whole situation, is to PAY good money for geo located photos, scat, fur, carcases(dead natural causes), etc, etc, of wolves, coyotes, eagles,wolverienes, rtc, etc, and make them worth a lot more, alive than dead.There must be plenty of researchers who would pay for samples(scat) ,that contain genetic info that can be used to understand our eveolving wilderness interface areas. Make it part of BLM, or forset services, whatever, and go national. The truth is ,that in private, many rural people will express a possitive attitude towards all the critters and natural phenominon, but know full well that outside interventions in the lives of rural people is directly responsible for people failing to thrive, so will express solidarity in whatever......emblamatic.... confrontation is the most publisised, as otherwise its just the slow grind of beuorcracy adding costs and wasting time, and the lack of modern services to ballance any of the taxes and fees, extracted, often by force.