2 ms·
I think this comment confused a few things. First off, there is no evidence the US will never fund science again. Second, top scientific positions in the US a
by refurb 2y ago
I think this comment confused a few things.
First off, there is no evidence the US will never fund science again.
Second, top scientific positions in the US are at academic labs, not at NIH (bare a few top people spending some time there). The top academic labs in the US get some funding from NIH, but the top ones get it from a ton of sources with NIH not being the bulk of it.
- nicce 2y agoBut does anyone take any science seriously anymore, if the conditions of the US funding would be that don't even mention the topics related to women or climate change?
- Sharlin 2y agoBut those aren’t real research anyway /s
- Fomite 2y ago"The top academic labs in the US get some funding from NIH, but the top ones get it from a ton of sources with NIH not being the bulk of it." This is wildly field specific.