3 ms·
A physical action (like occupying infrastructure) that limits other people’s freedom to move, or brings harm to them or their property, is a violent act to most
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
A physical action (like occupying infrastructure) that limits other people’s freedom to move, or brings harm to them or their property, is a violent act to most people. The only people that would claim otherwise are those who want to downplay illegal acts that align with their own politics.
Here’s a definition for ‘violence’, so you’re clear on how blocking highways is violence:
> violence: an unjust or unwarranted exertion of force or power, as against rights or laws
Here’s a definition for riot, so you’re clear on how a violent takeover of public infrastructure constitutes a riot:
> riot: “public violence, tumult, or disorder“
- RajT88 2y agoBeing in the way is neither force, nor power. But, y'know. For some people, up is down, black is white and war is peace. To be clear you're suggesting standing in the street constitutes: > a violent takeover of public infrastructure I suppose sitting in a diner which people didn't want you sitting in would also constitute, "A violent takeover of a private establishment".