4 ms·
I agree. I don't think there's really a case for the US developing any offensive weapons. Geographically, economically and politically, we are not under any sor
by siltcakes 2y ago
I agree. I don't think there's really a case for the US developing any offensive weapons. Geographically, economically and politically, we are not under any sort of credible threat. Maybe AI based missile defense or something, but we already have a completely unjustified arsenal of offensive weapons and a history of using them amorally.
- scottyah 2y agoWithout going too far into it, if we laid down all offensive weapons the cartels in Mexico would be inside US borders and killing people within a day.
- siltcakes 2y agoYou think the cartels aren't attacking us because we have missiles that can hit Mexico? I don't agree. Somewhat tangentially, the cartels only exist because the US made recreational drugs illegal.
- scottyah 2y agoNot sure where the missiles came from, you said all offensive weapons so in my mind I was picturing basic firearms. Drug trade might be their most profitable business but I think you're missing a whole lot of cultural context by saying the US's policy on drugs is their sole reason for existing. Plenty of cartels deal in sex trafficking, kidnapping, extortion, and even mining and logging today.
- catlikesshrimp 2y ago"Geographically, economically and politically, we are not under any sort of credible threat. " The US is politically and economically declining, already. And its area of influence has been weakening since, the 90's? It would be bad strategy to not do anything until you feel hopelessly threathened.
- siltcakes 2y agoI don't think we would ever be justified in going on the offensive nor do I think that makes us safer in any way.