3 ms·

Absolutely! jj is a real advancement in the state of the art. I think it's the second time in the history of source control where the authors of a new system ha

Absolutely! jj is a real advancement in the state of the art. I think it's the second time in the history of source control where the authors of a new system have spent a long time working on existing systems + deploying them at scale, and have brought their full expertise to bear on the design of the new system. (The first was BitKeeper, which also was a tremendous achievement.)

ahartmetz 2y ago
Third time? SVN was a big improvement over CVS. CVS was full of UX blunders, kind of like Git compared to something with good UX.
- sunshowers 2y ago
  Did the Subversion creators have a lot of prior experience working on CVS?
  - steveklabnik 2y ago
    Yes: https://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.intro.whatis.html#svn.intro.history https://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.intro.whatis.html#sv... > In February 2000, they contacted Karl Fogel, the author of Open Source Development with CVS (Coriolis, 1999), and asked if he'd like to work on this new project. Coincidentally, at the time Karl was already discussing a design for a new version control system with his friend Jim Blandy. In 1995, the two had started Cyclic Software, a company providing CVS support contracts, and although they later sold the business, they still used CVS every day at their jobs You may recognize Jim as one of the authors of Programming Rust.
    - sunshowers 2y ago
      oh neat!
- rob74 2y ago
  ...and don't ask about the first version control tool I had the "pleasure" of using, M$'s Visual SourceSafe o_O
  - ahartmetz 2y ago
    From what I've heard, it was more of a version information disposal system.