4 ms·
In WWII neither side used poison gas. It doesn’t have to be this way.
by octopoc 2y ago
In WWII neither side used poison gas. It doesn’t have to be this way.
- r053bud 2y agoExcuse me, what?
- vondur 2y agoIt means all nations can agree to not unleash AI based weapons on the world. Sadly I don't see this happening.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- eterm 2y agoI think we can assume good fath and the grandparent merely forgot to add "in combat" to that statement, rather than deliberately trying to downplay the use of Zyklon B.
- SanjayMehta 2y agoNot on the battlefield.
- dahdum 2y agoIt took the use of poison gas to get countries on board, and some will still use it. Just more carefully. Would China, Russia, or Iran agree to such a preemptive AI weapons ban? Doubtful, it’s their chance to close the gap. I’m onboard if so, but I don’t see anything happening on that front until well after they start dominating the landscape.
- int_19h 2y agoRussia would most definitely not agree to it given that Ukraine is already deploying autonomous drones against it.
- dataflow 2y agoYou should read this, it might change your mind: https://acoup.blog/2020/03/20/collections-why-dont-we-use-chemical-weapons-anymore/ https://acoup.blog/2020/03/20/collections-why-dont-we-use-ch...