4 ms·

I'm an Apple guy and I have to disagree, it's not the Telco's. Android implemented RCS and Apple dragged their feet in implementing the standardised platform s

I'm an Apple guy and I have to disagree, it's not the Telco's. Android implemented RCS and Apple dragged their feet in implementing the standardised platform such that high quality messaging was seamless and agnostic between brands The iPhone needed to reduce the quality of pics/videos to non-iMessage recipients because Apple didn't support any other form of non-iMessage messaging.

zie 2y ago
RCS is not really an open standard though. If you want encrypted RCS with android phones, you can't unless Google lets you. At least that was true last I checked. I'm guessing it hasn't changed.
- whimsicalism 2y ago
  who are you trying to convince? nobody in the know thinks this is a google problem, the facts are pretty obvious
  - zie 2y ago
    Google totally controls that ability. Apple is not any better here, but it's weird to call out Apple as being the only meanie here, when both Apple and Google are equally terrible when it comes to cross-platform e2e messaging. Thankfully we have Signal, which solves the problem better than either platform option.
    - saintfire 2y ago
      Not to say Signal is worse than either option, because it's not, but they really hampered adoption by removing SMS (at least in NA). I have almost no way to convince anyone other than people very close to me to use it due to the (lack) of network effect. If they could just use it instead of the default messenger then it's a dramatically easier sell. Obviously it's up to the Signal Foundation about the direction they take but I don't know if I've seen anyone agree with the justifications. Google and Apple wrap up their locked down BS with SMS for the same reason. It's by default free of network effect but passively pulls people in.
- dimator 2y ago
  Are you saying if Apple asked Google to sit down and come up with an encrypted RCS working group and get proper interop done, it would be _Google_ that would decline?
  - zie 2y ago
    Why would Google say yes?
    - chrismarlow9 2y ago
      To have easy compatibility with other devices. Why wouldn't they say yes?
      - zie 2y ago
        That's not something they care about, as if they did, they would have already opened it.
  - oneplane 2y ago
    Google was already asked and they said no. They want to keep their non-standard RCS, both server-side and client-side and will not share it. Or more specifically: it's a different product ("Google Messages") that just happens to be based on RCS. They do have some partnerships with hardware manufacturers that ship Play on their devices, and they will preload Google Messages in there as well. In essence, it doesn't exist in AOSP, and doesn't really live side-by-side with a normal messaging app (i.e. one that only does baseband native messaging), I wouldn't be surprised if the partnerships and preloading conditions state the manufacturer can't ship their own version (I think at least Samsung had to drop their own "Samsung Messages" app as reported in one of the reviews of a foldable display phone). In a way, RCS made no difference, and whatever Google did was mostly just to compete with Meta (both FB Messenger and WhatsApp). Fun fact: Google Messages is closer to Matrix than it is to iMessage in terms of comparable technical features.
- ChadNauseam 2y ago
  It’s not as if SMS is e2e encrypted right? Is RCS worse in that dimension in some way?
  - gf000 2y ago
    RCS is supported by Apple for quite some time now, though?
    - zie 2y ago
      Apple's RCS is not encrypted, nobodies RCS is encrypted unless you happen to be Google.
canucker2016 2y ago
iPhone, for non-iMessage recipients, was limited by MMS limits. Who sets the MMS limits? the telcos - actually min(both ends), the iPhone sender's telco and the recipient's telco. iMessage was introduced in 2011. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMessage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMessage Google announced RCS support for Google Messages in 2019. from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services "In June 2019, Google announced that it would begin to deploy RCS on an opt-in basis via the Messages app, with service compliant with the Universal Profile and hosted by Google (i.e. Jibe) rather than the user's carrier, if the carrier does not provide RCS." Before 2019, Android users depended on their telco to support RCS. The RCS wikipedia article talks about Samsung support for RCS in USA in 2015 and Android Lollipop OS users getting RCS support - but they still needed telco support.
- NoPicklez 2y ago
  They still needed Telco support and Telco's have adopted the technology, Apple has only just adopted the technology late last year, taking them approximately 4+ years since it was supported. Yes Apple provided an improved messaging service before there was one via iMessage, however they have failed in allowing their service to integrate with the rest of the industry that is looking to support an improved open standard that would allow for a better experience between different mobile operating systems. The original point you commented on was about Apple not integrating with other platforms. As I said, I'm an Apple guy but Apple should've implemented RCS as soon as the telco's supported it.
  - inkyoto 2y ago
    > They still needed Telco support and Telco's have adopted the technology […] My Telco, the largest national mobile carrier, still does not support RCS in 2025, which makes RCS and which mobile platform supports it and which does not a moot point for me. Telcos do not have an incentive to upgrade the messaging infrastructure alone unless the upgrade comes as part of the core network upgrade, which is usually bound to the number increase in <whatever>G. Since the introduction of 4G, when mobile networks turned into dumb data pipes for everything, including voice, there is very little money to be made in the telco business. ISP's have suffered the same fate.
Schiendelman 2y ago
Have you tried using RCS when you're used to iMessage? It's terrible. Constant failures, weird behavior when changing towers between telcos - not to mention what happens when traveling internationally, where RCS turns on, off, on, off... for a day after arrival. And of course there's no encryption standard.
- notirk 2y ago
  I haven't had those problems with RCS on my Android phone over the last few years of using it. But yes, the lack of encryption (outside of Google's tacked on version) is a problem.
  - Schiendelman 2y ago
    Google is going outside the standard to prop you up on their phones. Apple can't do that and remain compliant with the standard.
- worthless-trash 2y ago
  I use it every day and across multiple countries in Asia Pacific with no issues. Maybe its your phone going overseas and not working correctly.
  - Schiendelman 2y ago
    On what device?
    - worthless-trash 2y ago
      Samsung S22+, Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (aka everywhere but europe). I buy an Esim for countries I visit, usually before I go. Add it before the flight, sometimes in the country. List of countries I have worked with: Singapore (Roaming), Indonesia, Malaysia (I may have been roaming in Malaysia) I can't find the esim info, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, India (Maybe i was roaming, can't remember).

zie 2y ago

RCS is not really an open standard though. If you want encrypted RCS with android phones, you can't unless Google lets you. At least that was true last I checked. I'm guessing it hasn't changed.

whimsicalism 2y ago
who are you trying to convince? nobody in the know thinks this is a google problem, the facts are pretty obvious
- zie 2y ago
  Google totally controls that ability. Apple is not any better here, but it's weird to call out Apple as being the only meanie here, when both Apple and Google are equally terrible when it comes to cross-platform e2e messaging. Thankfully we have Signal, which solves the problem better than either platform option.
  - saintfire 2y ago
    Not to say Signal is worse than either option, because it's not, but they really hampered adoption by removing SMS (at least in NA). I have almost no way to convince anyone other than people very close to me to use it due to the (lack) of network effect. If they could just use it instead of the default messenger then it's a dramatically easier sell. Obviously it's up to the Signal Foundation about the direction they take but I don't know if I've seen anyone agree with the justifications. Google and Apple wrap up their locked down BS with SMS for the same reason. It's by default free of network effect but passively pulls people in.
dimator 2y ago
Are you saying if Apple asked Google to sit down and come up with an encrypted RCS working group and get proper interop done, it would be _Google_ that would decline?
- zie 2y ago
  Why would Google say yes?
  - chrismarlow9 2y ago
    To have easy compatibility with other devices. Why wouldn't they say yes?
    - zie 2y ago
      That's not something they care about, as if they did, they would have already opened it.
- oneplane 2y ago
  Google was already asked and they said no. They want to keep their non-standard RCS, both server-side and client-side and will not share it. Or more specifically: it's a different product ("Google Messages") that just happens to be based on RCS. They do have some partnerships with hardware manufacturers that ship Play on their devices, and they will preload Google Messages in there as well. In essence, it doesn't exist in AOSP, and doesn't really live side-by-side with a normal messaging app (i.e. one that only does baseband native messaging), I wouldn't be surprised if the partnerships and preloading conditions state the manufacturer can't ship their own version (I think at least Samsung had to drop their own "Samsung Messages" app as reported in one of the reviews of a foldable display phone). In a way, RCS made no difference, and whatever Google did was mostly just to compete with Meta (both FB Messenger and WhatsApp). Fun fact: Google Messages is closer to Matrix than it is to iMessage in terms of comparable technical features.
ChadNauseam 2y ago
It’s not as if SMS is e2e encrypted right? Is RCS worse in that dimension in some way?
- gf000 2y ago
  RCS is supported by Apple for quite some time now, though?
  - zie 2y ago
    Apple's RCS is not encrypted, nobodies RCS is encrypted unless you happen to be Google.

canucker2016 2y ago

iPhone, for non-iMessage recipients, was limited by MMS limits. Who sets the MMS limits? the telcos - actually min(both ends), the iPhone sender's telco and the recipient's telco. iMessage was introduced in 2011. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMessage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMessage Google announced RCS support for Google Messages in 2019. from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Communication_Services "In June 2019, Google announced that it would begin to deploy RCS on an opt-in basis via the Messages app, with service compliant with the Universal Profile and hosted by Google (i.e. Jibe) rather than the user's carrier, if the carrier does not provide RCS." Before 2019, Android users depended on their telco to support RCS. The RCS wikipedia article talks about Samsung support for RCS in USA in 2015 and Android Lollipop OS users getting RCS support - but they still needed telco support.

NoPicklez 2y ago
They still needed Telco support and Telco's have adopted the technology, Apple has only just adopted the technology late last year, taking them approximately 4+ years since it was supported. Yes Apple provided an improved messaging service before there was one via iMessage, however they have failed in allowing their service to integrate with the rest of the industry that is looking to support an improved open standard that would allow for a better experience between different mobile operating systems. The original point you commented on was about Apple not integrating with other platforms. As I said, I'm an Apple guy but Apple should've implemented RCS as soon as the telco's supported it.
- inkyoto 2y ago
  > They still needed Telco support and Telco's have adopted the technology […] My Telco, the largest national mobile carrier, still does not support RCS in 2025, which makes RCS and which mobile platform supports it and which does not a moot point for me. Telcos do not have an incentive to upgrade the messaging infrastructure alone unless the upgrade comes as part of the core network upgrade, which is usually bound to the number increase in <whatever>G. Since the introduction of 4G, when mobile networks turned into dumb data pipes for everything, including voice, there is very little money to be made in the telco business. ISP's have suffered the same fate.

Schiendelman 2y ago

Have you tried using RCS when you're used to iMessage? It's terrible. Constant failures, weird behavior when changing towers between telcos - not to mention what happens when traveling internationally, where RCS turns on, off, on, off... for a day after arrival. And of course there's no encryption standard.

notirk 2y ago
I haven't had those problems with RCS on my Android phone over the last few years of using it. But yes, the lack of encryption (outside of Google's tacked on version) is a problem.
- Schiendelman 2y ago
  Google is going outside the standard to prop you up on their phones. Apple can't do that and remain compliant with the standard.
worthless-trash 2y ago
I use it every day and across multiple countries in Asia Pacific with no issues. Maybe its your phone going overseas and not working correctly.
- Schiendelman 2y ago
  On what device?
  - worthless-trash 2y ago
    Samsung S22+, Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (aka everywhere but europe). I buy an Esim for countries I visit, usually before I go. Add it before the flight, sometimes in the country. List of countries I have worked with: Singapore (Roaming), Indonesia, Malaysia (I may have been roaming in Malaysia) I can't find the esim info, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, India (Maybe i was roaming, can't remember).