Yeah, I don't really dispute that, but I would like to hear the nominal explanation of this, from the people who support it. It's possible that there are parts

Yeah, I don't really dispute that, but I would like to hear the nominal explanation of this, from the people who support it. It's possible that there are parts of the federal government that really could be cut, I'm happy to acknowledge that, but what I really hate is how the entire Trump administration is sort of using logical implication incorrectly. It's like they're saying cutting workers implies more efficiency, but that actually isn't implied. They're roleplaying as being "logical" by misusing logic.