4 ms·
One of my chief worries about LLMs for intelligence agencies is the ability to scale textual analysis. Previously there at least had to be an agent taking an in
by causal 2y ago
One of my chief worries about LLMs for intelligence agencies is the ability to scale textual analysis. Previously there at least had to be an agent taking an interest in you; today an LLM could theoretically read all text you've ever touched and flag anything from legal violations to political sentiments.
- Etheryte 2y agoThis has already been possible long before LLMs came along. I also doubt that an LLM is the best tool for this at scale, if you're talking about sifting through billions of messages it gets too expensive very fast.
- causal 2y agoLLMs can do more than whatever we had before. Sentiment analysis and keyword searches only worked so well; LLMs understand meaning and intent. Cost and scale are not bottlenecks for long.
- aucisson_masque 2y ago> if you're talking about sifting through billions of messages it gets too expensive very fast. Who's paying for that tho ? The same dumbass who get spied over, i don't see it as a reason why it wouldn't happen. Cash is unlimited.
- int_19h 2y agoIt's only expensive if you throw all data directly at the largest models that you have. But the usual way to apply LMs to such large amounts of data is by staggering them: you have very small & fast classifiers operating first to weed out anything vaguely suspicious (and you train them to be aggressive - false positives are okay, false negatives are not). Things that get through get reviewed by a more advanced model. Repeat the loop as many times as needed for best throughput. No, OP is right. We are truly at the dystopian point where a sufficiently rich government can track the loyalty of its citizens in real time by monitoring all electronic communications. Also, "expensive" is relative. When you consider how much US has historically been willing to spend on such things...
- beefnugs 2y agoBut now instead of a human going "yes yes after a few hours of work i have chosen the target" they can go "we did more processing on who to best blow away, and it chose 100 more names than any human ever could! efficiency!"
- randomNumber7 2y agoYou could even use audio to text before that and tap all conversations in a country...
- redmajor12 2y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the_Gaza_Strip https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the...