> Claims from people who have proven to be the opposite of truthful. Interesting you say that. All I know is that confidential payment data is apparently bein

> Claims from people who have proven to be the opposite of truthful. Interesting you say that. All I know is that confidential payment data is apparently being handed to specific individual(s?), known to be partisan actors, who lost a bunch of lawsuits in court of law recently. Am I to just ignore that? The point is not to shut payments, but to use it in information warfare, Twitter Files Redux.