3 ms·
The goal is to underfund after "needed" cuts, to prove it is worthless, then they can have someone create a business and pay that same amount in tax money to a
by b3ing 2y ago
The goal is to underfund after "needed" cuts, to prove it is worthless, then they can have someone create a business and pay that same amount in tax money to a company instead. The CEO will take most of the money and use H-1B visa workers, contracts and so forth and pay them less, whereas the original government jobs paid better, had benefits and possibly a retirement.
- tombert 2y agoYeah, I don't really dispute that, but I would like to hear the nominal explanation of this, from the people who support it. It's possible that there are parts of the federal government that really could be cut, I'm happy to acknowledge that, but what I really hate is how the entire Trump administration is sort of using logical implication incorrectly. It's like they're saying cutting workers implies more efficiency, but that actually isn't implied. They're roleplaying as being "logical" by misusing logic.