5 ms·
No, those are identifiers that appear only in code. It's an IDE or git rename with no impact on the product. In this case, the engineers are changing the funct
by gregates 2y ago
No, those are identifiers that appear only in code. It's an IDE or git rename with no impact on the product.
In this case, the engineers are changing the functionality of the product, not just changing code identifiers.
- pc86 2y agoSo whether you agree with the policy aims or not, wouldn't that mean this is actually productive work while trawling through git histories changing "master" to "main" is just a nonproductive waste of time.
- miltonlost 2y ago"Whether or not you agree with the policy aims, wouldn't this mean that the death camps are actually doing productive work?" You can't ignore the policy aims when determining what is "productive" as productivity is directly to the end result. It's WORSE that this is productive vs non-productive. You're "Tired of nazi comparisons" when... Musk did two Nazi Salutes! He brought the comparison on by doing a Nazi salute! Twice! You're the one who refuses to see a salute for what it is.
- pc86 2y ago[flagged]
- tbossanova 2y agoCurious as to how the Nazi salute thing is seen by you? Just a little forgivable misstep?
- miltonlost 2y agoProbably looks like a good opportunity for a high five!!!
- tmnvdb 2y agoYes the case against death camps is not that they are a waste of time symbolic measure with no real world effects.
- bjourne 2y agoDid you tax money fund any master->main branch renamings?
- dark_glass 2y agoThis could be seen as technical debt, inherited by the current administration. These changes should have never taken place.
- zeroonetwothree 2y agoI imagine some government agencies do use git so the answer is likely yes.