>It's not irrelevant. If you're running a company you're have to take in more revenue than your expenses. It's irrelevant to the discussion, not irrelevant to

>It's not irrelevant. If you're running a company you're have to take in more revenue than your expenses. It's irrelevant to the discussion, not irrelevant to running a business in general. The context being whether the "shredding" of government size "like he did Twitter" is workable. And the observation I added being that, from an operational standapoint, Twitter works fine, despite the doomsday scenarios when Musk started his shredding. Government doesn't have to attract advertisers - or even turn a profit. Just to reduce it's spending. So if it can do that while (as Twitter) maintaining the same operational capacity, that's a win.