5 ms·

This looks very over engineered and complicated, we don't need more push notifications. Just use or improve upon email or RSS (recommended). It's anonymous, f

This looks very over engineered and complicated, we don't need more push notifications. Just use or improve upon email or RSS (recommended). It's anonymous, fast, privacy friendly (no device registrations or whatever), open and already decentralised so no need for anything else.

CuriousCosmic 2y ago
The purpose of this standard is to replace Google's FCM push notifications so that you can receive push notifications on a mobile device for a bunch of services while only needing to maintain a single low-overhead connection. This exists to improve battery life and decrease data usage for android users who don't use google services or prefer to host their own. And generally it exists to provide a standardised, independent, privacy preserving option for users and app developers. Neither RSS nor email solve this problem and actually this specific service would be the exact type of service you'd use to notify the user's device that the apps that use RSS or email have new content to fetch.
- colesantiago 2y ago
  I receive content from E-mail all the time and I am also notified about it and it doesn't drain my battery.
  - CuriousCosmic 2y ago
    But what is your email client using for notifications? If it's using intermittent/timed fetch, that runs into the latency problem (taking longer to receive notifications). Push notifications exist to solve that problem. If it's using IMAP's IDLE, MAPI's push, or JMAP's push, that's just another long-running HTTP or websocket connection. And this protocol (along with the proprietary push notif aggregation services it is aiming to replace) exists to deduplicate those many long-running connections into a single connection out to some hardwired server that manages the many services/connections for it.
    - colesantiago 2y ago
      > But what is your email client using for notifications? Local notifications? I don't see the problem here with email, it seems to work well that it is great for my use case. When you're offline with push notifications only the latest notification gets sent, not the previous notifications. This seems by design for notifications. At least with E-mail I can see a history of emails that was sent to me. I just see push notifications as a flawed concept that doesn't make sense for decentralised services.
      - jraph 2y ago
        I don't know what you mean by local notifications, but if you get a notification when a mail arrives, it's most probably because your mail client uses Google or Apple's push service if you use a regular mobile device, or if you installed and configured microG. And here's your issue: your app that has nothing to do with Google relies on a centralised Google service, and depends on a proprietary library that speaks to some proprietary code running on your device. Alternatively, your app isn't doing this, but then it risks being unreliable and stop notifying you if the system kills your app because it's been inactive for some time to save battery, or to reclaim memory, and/or it uses more battery than it could. This post is not about a way to have more notifications: it is an answer to these issues.
        colesantiago 2y ago
        > ... but if you get a notification when a mail arrives, it's most probably because your mail client uses Google or Apple's push service if you use a regular mobile device, or if you installed and configured microG. Except it doesn't? The Mail app on my iPhone doesn't use push notifications, fetch works well and I still get local notifications. No external push service at all. > Alternatively, your app isn't doing this, but then it risks being unreliable and stop notifying you if the system kills your app because it's been inactive for some time to save battery, or to reclaim memory, and/or it uses more battery than it could. You're saying a bunch of "issues" that never actually happened with me or anyone really, there is actually no issues here. E-Mail is fine.
- toast0 2y ago
  > The purpose of this standard is to replace Google's FCM push notifications so that you can receive push notifications on a mobile device for a bunch of services while only needing to maintain a single low-overhead connection. Isn't the purpose of Google's push service that you can receive notifications for a bunch of services with only a single connection? I don't quite understand how adding a different service helps, although having an alternative when Google's push is unavailable could be useful, and if there's some way to share that alternate service among many apps, that would reduce overhead of having two notification channels where each app with two channels has their own alternate channel?
  - CuriousCosmic 2y ago
    Yes that is the goal of google's push service. The benefit of this service is mainly for people who can't or don't want to use google's push service. Namely for users of de-googled devices and for users of android devices that google blocks from using play services (ex: users of Huawei devices). But also it's worth noting that unified push provides an optional google FCM fallback so that apps can use google's push services (provided they are available on the device) when a unifiedpush distributor isn't available or configured. So in this sense it means supporting a single push notification standard instead of multiple and the underlying system can switch between which provider to use. And of course for users of completely self hosted services this means you get all the benefits of a proper push aggregator like google's FCM without having to configure firebase with your services. This is particularly appealing if you self host locally and don't already use cloud services.
  - rcMgD2BwE72F 2y ago
    >I don't quite understand how adding a different service help I simply don't like having two monopolies (Google and Apple) handling every single push notification for all mobile users everywhere on Earth – except in China, maybe. There's so much you privacy risks and they can easily infer many things from the meta data alone. I thought we were in the post-Snowden phase already.
crtasm 2y ago
I would like all my push notifications to not rely on Google so this seems good to me. Signal sending me an email to tell me I have a new message would be a bad system.

CuriousCosmic 2y ago

The purpose of this standard is to replace Google's FCM push notifications so that you can receive push notifications on a mobile device for a bunch of services while only needing to maintain a single low-overhead connection. This exists to improve battery life and decrease data usage for android users who don't use google services or prefer to host their own. And generally it exists to provide a standardised, independent, privacy preserving option for users and app developers. Neither RSS nor email solve this problem and actually this specific service would be the exact type of service you'd use to notify the user's device that the apps that use RSS or email have new content to fetch.

colesantiago 2y ago
I receive content from E-mail all the time and I am also notified about it and it doesn't drain my battery.
- CuriousCosmic 2y ago
  But what is your email client using for notifications? If it's using intermittent/timed fetch, that runs into the latency problem (taking longer to receive notifications). Push notifications exist to solve that problem. If it's using IMAP's IDLE, MAPI's push, or JMAP's push, that's just another long-running HTTP or websocket connection. And this protocol (along with the proprietary push notif aggregation services it is aiming to replace) exists to deduplicate those many long-running connections into a single connection out to some hardwired server that manages the many services/connections for it.
  - colesantiago 2y ago
    > But what is your email client using for notifications? Local notifications? I don't see the problem here with email, it seems to work well that it is great for my use case. When you're offline with push notifications only the latest notification gets sent, not the previous notifications. This seems by design for notifications. At least with E-mail I can see a history of emails that was sent to me. I just see push notifications as a flawed concept that doesn't make sense for decentralised services.
    - jraph 2y ago
      I don't know what you mean by local notifications, but if you get a notification when a mail arrives, it's most probably because your mail client uses Google or Apple's push service if you use a regular mobile device, or if you installed and configured microG. And here's your issue: your app that has nothing to do with Google relies on a centralised Google service, and depends on a proprietary library that speaks to some proprietary code running on your device. Alternatively, your app isn't doing this, but then it risks being unreliable and stop notifying you if the system kills your app because it's been inactive for some time to save battery, or to reclaim memory, and/or it uses more battery than it could. This post is not about a way to have more notifications: it is an answer to these issues.
      - colesantiago 2y ago
        > ... but if you get a notification when a mail arrives, it's most probably because your mail client uses Google or Apple's push service if you use a regular mobile device, or if you installed and configured microG. Except it doesn't? The Mail app on my iPhone doesn't use push notifications, fetch works well and I still get local notifications. No external push service at all. > Alternatively, your app isn't doing this, but then it risks being unreliable and stop notifying you if the system kills your app because it's been inactive for some time to save battery, or to reclaim memory, and/or it uses more battery than it could. You're saying a bunch of "issues" that never actually happened with me or anyone really, there is actually no issues here. E-Mail is fine.
toast0 2y ago
> The purpose of this standard is to replace Google's FCM push notifications so that you can receive push notifications on a mobile device for a bunch of services while only needing to maintain a single low-overhead connection. Isn't the purpose of Google's push service that you can receive notifications for a bunch of services with only a single connection? I don't quite understand how adding a different service helps, although having an alternative when Google's push is unavailable could be useful, and if there's some way to share that alternate service among many apps, that would reduce overhead of having two notification channels where each app with two channels has their own alternate channel?
- CuriousCosmic 2y ago
  Yes that is the goal of google's push service. The benefit of this service is mainly for people who can't or don't want to use google's push service. Namely for users of de-googled devices and for users of android devices that google blocks from using play services (ex: users of Huawei devices). But also it's worth noting that unified push provides an optional google FCM fallback so that apps can use google's push services (provided they are available on the device) when a unifiedpush distributor isn't available or configured. So in this sense it means supporting a single push notification standard instead of multiple and the underlying system can switch between which provider to use. And of course for users of completely self hosted services this means you get all the benefits of a proper push aggregator like google's FCM without having to configure firebase with your services. This is particularly appealing if you self host locally and don't already use cloud services.
- rcMgD2BwE72F 2y ago
  >I don't quite understand how adding a different service help I simply don't like having two monopolies (Google and Apple) handling every single push notification for all mobile users everywhere on Earth – except in China, maybe. There's so much you privacy risks and they can easily infer many things from the meta data alone. I thought we were in the post-Snowden phase already.

crtasm 2y ago

I would like all my push notifications to not rely on Google so this seems good to me. Signal sending me an email to tell me I have a new message would be a bad system.