3 ms·

Have you considered reducing the overall scope of the federal government rather than just the executive branch?

• jimkleiber 2y ago
  And have the scope picked up by state and local governments (or even a global one)? Or just let corporations make the rules? I see the government doing at least two things: setting rules and providing services. Do you want fewer rules or fewer services? Or something else?
  • tonymet 2y ago
    In the USA the general scope for federal & state has expanded, with Federal having the most growth since about 16th Amendment. US code & regulations has expanded 1000x , cost per capita is 15000x I only make the point that there is a broad spectrum of functional scopes for the government, and rather than looking at shifting the scope around, another possibility would be to revert the scope to sustainable levels
  • biohcacker84 2y ago
    Yes, state and local should pick up. The closer to the people a government is, the better it is. I want the fewest rules that create the most fair economy. And I know very few service better in the hands of government. And that includes bridges: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millau_Viaduct https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millau_Viaduct