2 ms·

How is this different from Wikipedia’s own “random article” feature?

j3s 2y ago
it looks and feels completely different, for one thing
guessmyname 2y ago
Your question doesn’t quite make sense. It sounds like you’re suggesting the two web pages are identical, just on different domains, but they’re obviously completely different. A better way to phrase your question would be: "Why would a TikTok-style (infinite scrolling) website for browsing Wikipedia articles appeal to today’s internet users?"
- pockmarked19 2y ago
  > Your question doesn’t quite make sense. Agreed, yet it is the standard question most people throw out for any unfamiliar idea. God forbid they have to form a single thought to grok something…although more charitably it is a form of “why should I care?”. Your rephrasing is a bit different, it discards the selfish aspect of the question which I think is not correct. Funnily though, anyone asking why they should care probably shouldn’t care yet.
  - pockmarked19 2y ago
    Nice to know HNers don’t read past the first word. Can’t say I am surprised.
- dangrape123 2y ago
  [flagged]
- LVB 2y ago
  It’s a reasonable question, and one I had myself. Of course the UX is different, but that is self evident and we don’t need to be pedantic. What’s not obvious is whether this is wrapping the existing RandomPage API, filtering it, doing some sort of prediction/recommendation, etc.
  - arrowsmith 2y ago
    > we don’t need to be pedantic You must be new to HN
    - seabass-labrax 2y ago
      Even more pedantically, parent's account is more than ten years older than yours or mine, and has ~50% more karma, so perhaps not :)
  - tbossanova 2y ago
    So perhaps your question is “how does this choose articles differently from wikipedias own random page?”? Which I also wondered.
- redcobra762 2y ago
  The question is fine; once you stop interpreting the words literally, you can clearly infer the question to be about substance rather than numerical identity. > How is this (meaningfully) different from Wikipedia’s own “random article” feature?
f1shy 2y ago
Good question: i had that thought for a second. But the I realized that for me, Incan imagine killing time here, but not in the random page. It is an image and a short text which allows to decide fast if it is interesting or not. I used to take a technical dictionary, and read random articles when bored. So I tried with random wiki, but just didn’t work. I will try this and I can already say, it will work.

j3s 2y ago

it looks and feels completely different, for one thing

Your question doesn’t quite make sense. It sounds like you’re suggesting the two web pages are identical, just on different domains, but they’re obviously completely different. A better way to phrase your question would be: "Why would a TikTok-style (infinite scrolling) website for browsing Wikipedia articles appeal to today’s internet users?"

pockmarked19 2y ago
> Your question doesn’t quite make sense. Agreed, yet it is the standard question most people throw out for any unfamiliar idea. God forbid they have to form a single thought to grok something…although more charitably it is a form of “why should I care?”. Your rephrasing is a bit different, it discards the selfish aspect of the question which I think is not correct. Funnily though, anyone asking why they should care probably shouldn’t care yet.
- pockmarked19 2y ago
  Nice to know HNers don’t read past the first word. Can’t say I am surprised.
dangrape123 2y ago
[flagged]
LVB 2y ago
It’s a reasonable question, and one I had myself. Of course the UX is different, but that is self evident and we don’t need to be pedantic. What’s not obvious is whether this is wrapping the existing RandomPage API, filtering it, doing some sort of prediction/recommendation, etc.
- arrowsmith 2y ago
  > we don’t need to be pedantic You must be new to HN
  - seabass-labrax 2y ago
    Even more pedantically, parent's account is more than ten years older than yours or mine, and has ~50% more karma, so perhaps not :)
- tbossanova 2y ago
  So perhaps your question is “how does this choose articles differently from wikipedias own random page?”? Which I also wondered.
redcobra762 2y ago
The question is fine; once you stop interpreting the words literally, you can clearly infer the question to be about substance rather than numerical identity. > How is this (meaningfully) different from Wikipedia’s own “random article” feature?

f1shy 2y ago

Good question: i had that thought for a second. But the I realized that for me, Incan imagine killing time here, but not in the random page. It is an image and a short text which allows to decide fast if it is interesting or not. I used to take a technical dictionary, and read random articles when bored. So I tried with random wiki, but just didn’t work. I will try this and I can already say, it will work.