9 ms·
I think that shows conservatives were so starved for rage content that they needed to latch onto the side-show of a side-show in order to scratch that itch. Seq
by IncreasePosts 2y ago
I think that shows conservatives were so starved for rage content that they needed to latch onto the side-show of a side-show in order to scratch that itch. Sequestering your candidate away from any kind of challenge certainly is a strategy.
I never said MAGA didn't say anything about Harris/walz. Is that what you took away from my post?
- 9283409232 2y ago> Liberals love consuming Trump content, maybe even more than conservatives. Sort of like the Howard Stern effect. Because after they do, they can go post on Twitter and reddit about how stupid Trump is. > Conservatives didn't have that with Harris. Yes that is what I took from this. > Sequestering your candidate away from any kind of challenge certainly is a strategy. Interviews with Fox News and a public debate does not read as running away from challenge. She is not the one who ran from the debates.
- IncreasePosts 2y agoHarris had fewer than half the media appearances as Trump. There is nothing to debate on this front. https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/trump-harris-tv-podcast-media-appearances-2024-election-951ba95c https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/trump-harris-tv-podca...
- 9283409232 2y agoDoing less media != Running away from challenges. I'm sure all the right wing interviews and podcast appearances Trump did really threw him the hard questions.