4 ms·
Thanks! We have a virtual camera on our roadmap as well, but by building the conferencing platform end to end we can optimize both latency and conversation UX
by christiansafka 2y ago
Thanks! We have a virtual camera on our roadmap as well, but by building the conferencing platform end to end we can optimize both latency and conversation UX to a much higher degree. We're also lucky to be building this now and not five years ago - there are some solid webrtc infra companies and open source projects to build on.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- AznHisoka 2y agoWould companies switch their video conferencing solution to yours, or do you envision them using both side by side?
- christiansafka 2y agoWe're hoping companies with international teams will switch over fully (we have internally), but our initial goal is to attract a subset of the market that has cross-lingual needs and unblock them as much as possible from using it more.
- elwillbo 2y agoWould love the virtual camera - will be on the look out for it to arrive
- btown 2y agoCurious about this approach! It looks like you're connecting to https://livekit.io/ https://livekit.io/ under the hood - do you have custom server side components intercepting the video stream and doing video analysis & lip movement patching there? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41743327 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41743327 - looks like they do quite a bit of heavy lifting out of the gate!