3 ms·
Even so, I think the incentives are still for the Vanguard management to make as little profit as possible so that they can compete and have more funds under ma
by ElevenLathe 2y ago
Even so, I think the incentives are still for the Vanguard management to make as little profit as possible so that they can compete and have more funds under management. Controlling more billions of dollars of stock shares is kind of its own reward and brings many opportunities for enrichment, and if they don't have to worry about making money for shareholders, they can pretty much always engineer the lowest fees.
- anonymousDan 2y agoThis kind of thing makes me nervous. What kind of opportunities? Can they somehow loan out shares for example?
- recursivecaveat 2y agoEven if you don't touch a dime of it, "had $X million in funds under management" is good for your next job. In business better to be the CEO of an ailing billion dollar business and drive it into the ground than actually do a good job managing a firm 1/10th the size.
- giantg2 2y agoYes, in theory the fund-owned structure should mean they can charge lower fees than profit driven competitors. However, if competitors are doing things like zero fee funds as loss leaders, or have a banking side to diffuse costs, then it gets less clear.