> they would / should face severe consequences for defrauding the state. They are not above the law I don't know how to reply to a statement this naive. What a

> they would / should face severe consequences for defrauding the state. They are not above the law I don't know how to reply to a statement this naive. What about the past 8 years makes you think these people are not above the law? > I don't know what checks and balances are available for that case though. SCOTUS declared the president immune to prosecution. The only check on a rogue president is a 60+ seat majority of the opposite party in the Senate, which hasn't happened since the 1980s.